Nildogma
Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts

Saturday, 9 May 2015

Don't let ignorance spoil your trousers

No comments : Posted by Nildogma at Saturday, May 09, 2015 Labels: argument from ignorance , atheism , Christianity , faith , God , Proof of God
Transport yourself back in time six hundred years. Look up into the sky and see the sun. You don't know what it is but you know it gives off huge amounts of heat and light—enough to warm and illuminate the entire planet.
As you gaze at this celestial monster there is one thing you are sure of—something as powerful as that and so essential for human life could not have happened by accident—it must have had a designer. A designer who created it and put it in the perfect orbit to give the exact amount heat and the exact amount of day and night necessary to sustain all living things on Earth. At that moment, you fall to your knees and thank your god (whichever god you happened to believe in).
...
Returning to the 21st century, we have moved on. We understand our sun very well indeed. We know its chemistry and the physics that formed it and sustains it. We understand how it formed, how long it will live, how it will change over its lifetime and how it will die. And we know all of that is caused by natural, unguided processes.
We have learned so much in the intervening years that there are only a few deep mysteries remaining, such as the origin of life and the cause of the Big Bang.
But one thing has not changed. Still billions of people assume their gods are responsible for things they don't understand. It is wise to learn from history rather than repeat it. Don't be on your knees when the true origin of life is finally discovered. Get up, brush yourself off, and withhold belief until we actually know how it happened.
After all, trousers are valuable, and so is your dignity.
Read More

Thursday, 30 April 2015

Your inner caveman

No comments : Posted by Nildogma at Thursday, April 30, 2015 Labels: atheism , beliefs , God , History , Homo sapiens , Human Species , religion , Science
Viewing from a distance can often reveal things that cannot be seen close up. To gain a sense of perspective, it is interesting to look at our species, not for a few generations but for our entire existence.
The best evidence available suggests our species has roamed the earth for at least 200,000 years, probably more. Most of that time we were itinerant hunter-gatherers. We used sharpened sticks and flaked stones as tools and weapons.
Things changed very slowly indeed for our Stone Age ancestors until about 12,000 years ago with the beginning of agriculture. That was when we started to grow our own food which forced us into permanent settlements, and gave rise to much larger communities.
An unintended consequence of the agricultural revolution was that people could own land and charge rent and leaders could levy taxes. So, we saw the emergence of a tier of wealthy property owners and rulers.
The next big change, starting just over 5,000 years ago, was the discovery of bronze. Smelting copper and tin produced a metal that could be forged into tools and weapons and were far superior to their stone equivalents.
The invention of bronze tools for cutting wood paved the way, around 4,000 years ago, for one of the most important inventions of all time—the wheel.
And soon after this came the invention of writing and mathematics.
Bronze was a ground-breaking invention but it was a relatively soft metal and sharpened blades blunted very quickly. But some 3,200 years ago we discovered how to smelt iron and the Iron Age was born.
There were more revolutions to come but the foundations for our modern society were almost in place 3,000 years ago with the inventions of agriculture, the wheel, writing, mathematics and iron. Just one more foundation stone was required and it took another 2,000 years. That was the invention of science, which started with Thales' extraordinary idea that everything that happened could have a natural explanation and culminated in a reliable process for investigating natural things, now known as the scientific method.
Now for the perspective. For at least 94% of the time our species has existed, we have been Stone Age hunter gatherers. For more than 99.5% of our time here we had no reliable method for understanding our world and we relied on gods, magic, stars and superstition.
In the 0.5% of our time on Earth since then, we have been through the industrial revolution and we have started our journey through the information revolution. We have walked on the moon, sent craft to the outer reaches of our solar system and created machines that can look back in time to the beginning of the universe, more than 13 billion years ago.
We can travel to any place on Earth in less than a day and can talk to people on the other side of the planet, as though they were in the same room. We have eradicated diseases, like smallpox, that used to kill three million people yearly and we can transplant failed organs to repair people who would otherwise die.
All these advances, from the industrial revolution onwards, have relied on science. Not a single advance has been given to us by the gods, magic, stars or superstition that our ancestors relied on for hundreds of millennia.
We must not forget that we are not just related to those Stone Age men and women from 200,000 years ago—we ARE those people. We are the same species, made of the same stuff and to the same design. We have evolved slightly over those years but negligible changes have occurred in the last 1,000 years. We could still mate with one of our Stone Age ancestors and produce viable offspring.
This perspective may explain why, after the scientific approach has thoroughly proven itself and gods, magic, stars and superstition have been equally thoroughly discredited, that 85% of us still want to believe that gods, magic, stars and superstition are real and valuable. They are not.
That is our inner caveman speaking. It's time to let him go.
Read More

Saturday, 17 January 2015

Do you have to be stupid to believe in God?

No comments : Posted by Nildogma at Saturday, January 17, 2015 Labels: atheism , believe in God , Christianity , Christians , faith , God , IQ and belief , religion , why believe , why smart people believe
When I hear atheists saying people have to be stupid to believe in God, I am reminded of Christians who say you can't have morals without God.
Both statements are crass because the evidence is abundant. There are plenty of atheists with high moral values and plenty of smart people who believe in God.
But there is no evidence that God exists and almost all versions of God mandate belief in a magical, chaotic and undetectable supernatural realm. For those who take scripture to be literally true, belief in God rapidly spirals into absurdity. So how can smart people believe things like this?
It is easier to explain this by analogy. There is no doubt that smoking is harmful to our health. There is plenty of validated evidence that smoking significantly increases your risk of emphysema, chronic bronchitis, heart disease and many forms of cancer. Yet we probably all know smart people who smoke.
People smoke because it satisfies them and they rationalise away the evidence of risks. People believe in God because it satisfies them and they rationalise away the lack of evidence and all the contrary evidence.
So, belief in God is a preference, just like preferring redheads to brunettes and no-one is obliged to justify their preferences.
Actually, it is a little more subtle than that. The smart smoker is implicitly saying, I like to smoke and I am prepared to accept the risk to my health. And the smart believer is implicitly saying I like to believe in God and I accept the risk that my belief may not be true.
You may think I'm arguing that our unconscious preferences drive our behaviour and we are little more than spectators. There is more truth to that than most of us like to admit but there is plenty of evidence that our preferences can change and we can influence the process.
It's a fact that better educated people are less likely to believe in God (and less likely to smoke). So being smart can help you take control of your preferences; understanding the process can help everyone take control of their preferences
You don't have to be a spectator.
Read More

Saturday, 14 June 2014

How logic fails God-believers

15 comments : Posted by Nildogma at Saturday, June 14, 2014 Labels: atheism , beliefs , bill flavell , Christianity , Christians , faith , God , logic and god , religion , why believe
Here is a simple problem of logic.

“Jack is looking at Anne, but Anne is looking at George. Jack is married but George is not. Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?” The answer can be "yes" or "no", or "cannot be determined".

Around 90% of people will get this wrong despite the fact that you are given all the information necessary to get it right.

Many of the people who fail to solve this conundrum are very sure about another, infinitely more difficult conundrum with highly incomplete information. They say, "Something cannot come from nothing therefore the universe must have been created by something outside of the universe. That something we call God".

People arrive at this conclusion:

1) Knowing it is based on inductive reasoning which never guarantees a correct conclusion (we never see something coming from nothing, therefore it cannot happen) .

2) Not knowing what, if anything, existed prior to the Big Bang.

3) Knowing the laws of physics (and, therefore, classical cause and effect) cannot have applied before matter appeared.

The Jack, Anne and George conundrum illustrates that humans typically have limited and highly fallible logic skills yet we can  still be certain we have the correct answer to highly complex problems even when we lack the information to solve them.

So, for the avoidance of doubt, the  "Something cannot come from nothing" argument is fatally flawed and you do yourself no credit if you repeat it.

Oh yes, the correct answer to the Jack, Anne and George conundrum is "yes". Did you get it right?

______________________________
If you need help with the logic...

Jack is married, George is not, Anne is either married or not.
If Anne is not married: a married person (Jack) is looking at an unmarried person (Anne).
If Anne is married: a married person (Anne) is looking at an unmarried person (George).


So, either way, a married person is indeed looking at an unmarried person. We have sufficient information to determine that a married person is looking at an unmarried person, but not which couple this applies to.
Read More
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )

Nildogma, the blogga

Subscribe in a reader

FREE Stuff from Nildogma

Tell people who you are & what you think.
Download atheist and free thinker covers pages for Facebook.

Search This Blog

About Me

My photo
Nildogma
As a 20-year-old I was insatiably curious about the world and passionate about rejecting superstitions and all kinds of false beliefs. I still am today. Sometimes when people believe things that are not true, it make little or no difference but sometimes the consequences can be disastrous and deadly. Now, I do what I can to help people improve their thinking skills, especially in how they impinge on core beliefs, such as cultural values and religious beliefs. I have an active Facebook page for which I create memes and write articles almost daily. I also engage people in on-line debates. You can find me here: https://www.facebook.com/bill.flavell.1 I lecture at universities around the world and present or debate at public meetings. I also, draw on my management consultancy background to help freethought groups, almost anywhere in the world, to get organised, develop strategy and improve their media and presentation skills. If you would like me to present at your university or for your church group or freethought group, please contact me.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

  • 2015 (8)
    • May (2)
      • Don't let ignorance spoil your trousers
      • Can answered prayers prove God exists?
    • April (4)
    • January (2)
  • 2014 (35)
    • August (3)
    • July (3)
    • June (2)
    • May (6)
    • April (5)
    • March (5)
    • February (11)

Popular Posts

  • How logic fails God-believers
    Here is a simple problem of logic. “Jack is looking at Anne, but Anne is looking at George. Jack is married but George is not. Is a marr...
  • How sin kills Christianity
    According to Christian theology, before Adam and Eve's famous serpent-induced transgressions, they were sin-free, just as God had made...
  • Can answered prayers prove God exists?
    Let's do a thought experiment. I'll start by inventing a god, I'm going to call her Ninfinity. She is very beautiful and she...
  • Adiós Christianity
    Christianity is an elderly religion that is showing its age. It contains such huge helpings of magic and nonsense that it speaks to fewer an...
  • Finally, proof that God is stupid
    God is said to be omniscient and unchanging. But what are the implications of these characteristics? 1) Stupid people cannot learn God ca...
  • Religion and corruption
    There is no corruption-free country in the world—every country experiences some level of corruption. But the huge differences in the leve...
  • YAHWEH, the DIY God
    It was quite a stroke of luck for the Jews. Out of all the peoples in the entire world, the 12 small tribes of Israel were the chosen peo...
  • Standing on the shoulders of giants
    Thales of Miletus In a letter to Robert Hooke, written in February 1676, the great Isaac Newton wrote, "If I have seen further it ...
  • A tale of two ways of thinking...
    In 2012, an international team of scientists working at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) on the Swiss/French border announced they had dem...
  • The Inside Story: God and Jesus, what REALLY happened...
    So much misinformation surrounds the lives of YHWH (God) and Jesus that it is hard to unravel what is true and what is hyperbole. Almost ...

© Nildogma 2013 . Powered by Bootstrap , Blogger templates and RWD Testing Tool